Przeczytaj ten tekst po Polsku.
Andrzej Domański has approached the National Electoral Commission (PKW) for an interpretation of the resolution from December 30 of the previous year regarding the financial report of the PiS committee. The National Electoral Commission, acting on the ruling of the Supreme Court chamber unrecognized by Tusk’s regime, accepted the financial report of the PiS committee from the 2023 parliamentary elections. However, Law and Justice (PiS) still has not received funds from the political party subsidies. Now the PKW has only one option left – to illustrate the resolution in pictograms and send it back to Minister Domański. Let the poor guy puzzle it out!
The most direct commentary on the situation came from MP Konrad Berkowicz from the “Confederation” party, who boldly declared that Minister Domański is “playing dumb.” Sharp, brave, and delivered with Berkowicz’s characteristic charm – akin to an elephant in a china shop. Moreover, through the comments of opposition MPs, one might sense – or so I interpret it – an incredibly daring thesis (which, I believe, has nothing to do with reality): that Minister Domański’s IQ is somewhere at the level of the water in my pond at the end of cucumber season – meaning far too low. This is wrong. Minister Domański knows very well what most Poles still do not: in our country, the corporal is the one who grabs the baton first. And the current holder of said baton is (drumroll, please) none other than Donald Tusk.
It seems naive to think that the source of law in Poland is the Constitution and statutes, and here we are with such a surprise! And a shock as well! Now, the opposition unnecessarily clamors that the National Electoral Commission decided that the Supreme Court passed an appropriate resolution, but they overlook the declaration… of the Supreme Tusk. And that’s the most important thing; it is the true source of law. Let us recall what Donald “The Supreme” Tusk said: “There is no money, and there won’t be any.” Period. We don’t have your coat – to borrow a line from the cult Polish film Miś directed by Stanisław Bareja – so what are you going to do about it?
It’s no wonder that Minister Domański doesn’t understand written words and asks for clarification. Our education system is severely lacking. Once, we read: “Ala has a cat, and the cat has Ala,” and the situation was binary: Ala had some furry creature at home. Today, that sentence has become a great unknown, hanging over us and awaiting answers. Serious questions arise: Does Ala want to be an exemplary citizen and take on the responsibility of having a cat, and if so, why? Perhaps she wants to feel special, as everyone knows cats are creatures full of grace, charm, and personal allure, though when they get upset… they might soil the bed. Or perhaps the cat is a way to avoid questions from relatives like, “When are you getting married, and when are you having children?”
“And who has Ala?” – here begins the philosophical riddle that torments intellectual male minds. Ala, though proudly holding her cat, becomes the subject of universal (male chauvinistic) analysis: who takes care of her, who “owns” her? Or is it the cat that has Ala trapped, because every cat owner knows that it’s not people who own cats, but cats who own people?! Or maybe Ala is a metaphor for a society lost in the maze of interspecies love, where everyone seeks an answer to who “owns” whom and whether there might be children from it.
Our readers can clearly see that Minister Domański has reasons to ask questions, and no threats – like the possibility of going to prison someday – can pull him out of the obvious depression in which he finds himself. In any case, when the time comes, tell the investigators that you didn’t understand any of this and ask for treatment in France. There (apparently) they administer medicine rectally to children, and you look like a cherub. That alone (the treatment) will be punishment enough…
